<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOFX &#8220;Never Trust A Hippy&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifeinabungalo.com/2006/02/23/nofx-never-trust-a-hippy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifeinabungalo.com/2006/02/23/nofx-never-trust-a-hippy/</link>
	<description>Pissing Off Scenesters Since 1995</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 52pickup</title>
		<link>http://lifeinabungalo.com/2006/02/23/nofx-never-trust-a-hippy/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>52pickup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinabungalo.com/2006/02/23/nofx-never-trust-a-hippy/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>they are meaning that the band has been together that long. the ramones came first, but they mean nofx has stayed together longer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are meaning that the band has been together that long. the ramones came first, but they mean nofx has stayed together longer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chizad</title>
		<link>http://lifeinabungalo.com/2006/02/23/nofx-never-trust-a-hippy/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Chizad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinabungalo.com/2006/02/23/nofx-never-trust-a-hippy/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>That line sparked me to look that fact up, and hence find this site.  Every source I've found places NOFX as forming in 1983.  This is about the time I thought they formed anyway.
There is no way they were around longer than the Ramones.
The Ramones formed in 1974, long before NOFX was even thought about.  Even if you go with 77, the Hayday of CBGB's, this is still way off.  How do they explain this line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That line sparked me to look that fact up, and hence find this site.  Every source I&#8217;ve found places NOFX as forming in 1983.  This is about the time I thought they formed anyway.<br />
There is no way they were around longer than the Ramones.<br />
The Ramones formed in 1974, long before NOFX was even thought about.  Even if you go with 77, the Hayday of CBGB&#8217;s, this is still way off.  How do they explain this line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
